A scoped technical accessibility path for law firm websites that need clearer structure, labels, contrast, keyboard access and more usable digital intake.
A launch-ready first production version within 2 business days after the final design direction is approved and Svelex confirms Production Ready status in writing.
Included launch scope
Up to 12 total pages within the approved page structure and written Sprint scope.
Every included page receives an individual content hierarchy and conversion-focused composition; no cloned mass-production page set.
Technical SEO, schema, sitemap, metadata and GEO/AI Search Readiness.
Lead form, click-to-call path and routing into a reviewed Svelex request workflow.
Edge security and performance setup with a practical launch checklist.
WCAG-informed technical accessibility checks with automated review and manual checks of agreed journeys.
HD Screenshot-to-Build option for an approved visual and interaction reference.
Law firm fit
For boutique law firms, the sprint prioritizes trust, careful claims, controlled intake, accessibility signals and recovery confidence.
Practice-area and location modules stay factual, reviewable and non-promissory.
Intake copy avoids legal advice, attorney-client implications and case-outcome promises.
Accessibility and continuity language is precise and bounded.
Firm boundaries
Planning, discovery and design concept development happen before production and do not count toward the two-business-day window.
The production clock starts after final design approval, complete materials and written Production Ready confirmation.
If Svelex misses the production deadline for reasons within our control, the customer receives a full refund and may keep completed customer-specific work delivered up to that point, subject to the published Sprint terms.
No legal advice, ADA/WCAG compliance guarantee, ranking guarantee, indexing guarantee, revenue guarantee, security guarantee or uptime guarantee.
Monthly Managed plans remain separate and are scoped only when ongoing operation is requested.
Law firms that want a stronger accessibility posture without legal overpromising. The system links the first buyer signal to website, intake, CRM, automation, protection and reporting, so every improvement has a clear owner and next step.
AudienceLaw firms that want a stronger accessibility posture without legal overpromising.
Primary problemAccessibility is often treated as a one-time plugin.
Svelex mechanismA trust-first website and controlled intake path supported by accessibility engineering, careful claims, recovery planning and human review.
The highest-cost failure points in this operating lane.
01Accessibility is often treated as a one-time plugin.
02Forms, PDFs and third-party widgets create hidden barriers.
03Legal claims must stay precise.
What changes for your operation
Observed technical barriers are documented. The remaining outcomes turn that first improvement into a visible operating sequence for this specific lane.
01Observed technical barriers are documented.
02Remediation can be prioritized by user impact.
03Public statements stay precise about scope and limitations.
Implementation path
From “Define the pages and user journeys in scope” to “Plan ongoing accessibility review and feedback handling,” each stage has a defined owner, evidence requirement and approval point.
Define the pages and user journeys in scope.Observed technical barriers are documented. Scope and responsibility are confirmed before the next stage.
Combine automated checks with manual keyboard and assistive-technology review where agreed.Remediation can be prioritized by user impact. Scope and responsibility are confirmed before the next stage.
Prioritize fixes and document known limitations.Public statements stay precise about scope and limitations. Scope and responsibility are confirmed before the next stage.
Plan ongoing accessibility review and feedback handling.Observed technical barriers are documented. Scope and responsibility are confirmed before the next stage.
What you can expect from Svelex
Precise scope, market-specific priorities and clear limits before implementation begins.
Documented starting point
Define the pages and user journeys in scope. The evidence, owner and next decision are recorded before production changes.
Built for law firm decisions
Law firms that want a stronger accessibility posture without legal overpromising. Observed technical barriers are documented.
Claims with boundaries
Accessibility, intake, privacy and security work is described as scoped technical support, never as legal advice or lawsuit immunity.
Questions serious operators ask before they commit
Does this guarantee ADA compliance?
No. It is scoped technical accessibility work, not legal advice or a compliance guarantee.
Can WCAG 2.2 Level AA be a target?
Yes, as a technical target for the agreed scope. A conformance claim requires a complete evaluation.
Do third-party tools matter?
Yes. Chat, checkout, maps, forms and videos can affect the complete user journey.
Turn this problem into a clear next step.
Best when accessibility planning, security, continuity and recovery are the expensive risks. Start with the free signal when you want package direction before a scoped request.
